Cited by 296Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RELATIONSHIPS AT THE ABOVEGROUND–BELOWGROUND INTERFACE: PLANTS, SOIL BIOTA, AND SOIL PROCESSES

Open access

Abstract

Interactions at the aboveground–belowground interface provide important feedbacks that regulate ecosystem processes. Organisms within soil food webs are involved in processes of decomposition and nutrient mineralization, and their abundance and activity have been linked to plant ecophysiological traits such as species identity and the quality and quantity of plant tissue. We tested aboveground–belowground diversity relationships in a naturally developed plant community of native tallgrass prairie by taking soil samples from beneath naturally established grass tillers of chosen characteristics (e.g., homogeneous vs. heterogeneous plant combinations or C4 vs. C3 photosynthetic pathway) without imposing any disturbances to existing plant–soil relationships. The goal of this study was to elucidate the consequences, for soil microbiota (microflora phospholipid fatty acids, protozoa, and nematode functional groups) and for C and N mineralization, of plant community properties such as species richness, resource quality, resource heterogeneity, species identity, and presence of exotics. None of the biotic or abiotic soil variables was related to plant resource heterogeneity. Protozoa were not responsive to any of the plant community traits. Some bacterial and nematode groups were affected by plant characteristics specific to a particular plant species, but no uniform pattern emerged. Invasive and native plants generally were similar with respect to soil variables tested in this study. The lack of clear responses of soil variables to plant community traits indicates that idiosyncratic effects dominate both at the plant and soil biotic level and that generalized plant and soil diversity effects are hard to predict.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073[0377:rataip]2.0.co;2

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1126/science.289.5483.1255a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Porazinska, D. L., Bardgett, R. D., Blaauw, M. B., Hunt, H. W., Parsons, A. N., Seastedt, T. R., & Wall, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (US)
Venue
Ecological Monographs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
377-395
ISSN
0012-9615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2180213416
Cited by
296
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
22.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Monographs (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
aboveground-belowground interactions, plant-soil feedback, soil microbiota, soil food webs, nutrient mineralization, carbon mineralization, plant community diversity, resource heterogeneity, invasive plants, nematodes, protozoa, phospholipid fatty acids, tallgrass prairie, C3 and C4 photosynthesis, plant species identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RELATIONSHIPS AT THE ABOVEGROUND–BELOWGROUND INTERFACE: PLANTS, SOIL BIOTA, AND SOIL PROCESSES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073%5B0377:rataip%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Porazinska, D. L., Bardgett, R. D., Blaauw, M. B., Hunt, H. W., Parsons, A. N., Seastedt, T. R., & Wall, D. H. (2003). RELATIONSHIPS AT THE ABOVEGROUND–BELOWGROUND INTERFACE: PLANTS, SOIL BIOTA, AND SOIL PROCESSES. Ecological Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073%5B0377%3Arataip%5D2.0.co%3B2